Royal Dutch Shell Group .com

The Wall Street Journal Home Page
Article Search
Advanced Search
Quotes & Research
 Other Journal Sites  As of Friday, November 18, 2005     
 
LOG OUT
 
Today's Print Edition
U.S. | Europe | Asia
Past Editions
Features
Portfolio
Columnists
In-Depth Reports
Discussions
Company Research
Markets Data Center
Video Center
Site Map
Corrections
My Online Journal
Personalize My News
E-Mail Setup
My Account/Billing
RSS Feeds
Customer Service
The Online Journal
The Print Edition
Contact Us
Help
 
Advertiser Links
Featured Advertiser
 
 

NASDAQ Presents
"QQQ"
Diversify your portfolio.
 
 
Click to email this article Click to email this article Click to format this article for printing Click to format this article for printing View a list of most popular articles on our site
advertisement
Find out the latest market movements and trends in our e-mail alerts. Check the boxes below to subscribe.
Newshound Quiz
The Morning Brief
The Afternoon Report
The Evening Wrap
To view all or change any of your e-mail settings, click to the E-Mail Setup Center
COMPANIES
Dow Jones, Reuters
  PRICE
CHANGE
 
57.38
0.20
11/17

 
 
  PRICE
CHANGE
 
65.60
0.54
11/17

 
 
  PRICE
CHANGE
 
57.46
0.31
11/17

 
 
  PRICE
CHANGE
 
61.17
0.44
11/17

 
 
  PRICE
CHANGE
 
63.08
-1.62
11/17

 
* At Market Close
RELATED INDUSTRIES
Energy
 
  Personalized Home Page Setup
  Put headlines on your homepage about the companies, industries and topics that interest you most.  
 
 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: White House Backs Oil Firms' Attempt To Avoid New Tax: Friday 18 November 2005

By BRODY MULLINS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
November 18, 2005; Page A6

 

WASHINGTON -- The Senate approved a year-end tax bill early Friday after the White House and oil lobby failed to remove a measure that would add billions of dollars to the oil industry's tax bills.

The $70 billion, five-year tax bill would exempt millions of Americans from the alternative minimum tax, offer tax incentives to corporations and provide $7 billion in breaks to promote Gulf Coast reconstruction. The legislation doesn't include a coveted two-year extension of President Bush's 15% rates on capital gains and dividends. Republicans hope to add the lower rates into the bill during final negotiations with the House. The House could bring up similar legislation today.

Taking aim at big oil companies, the Senate bill includes a provision that would raise taxes by an estimated $4.3 billion over two years for companies that both produce and refine oil and gas by changing the way they account for oil supplies, according to the Senate Finance Committee.

QUESTION OF THE DAY
 
 
 Vote: How committed is Congress to reducing the deficit?
 
 

The White House said in a statement that it supported the bill, but opposed the new oil-industry taxes and the exclusion of the capital-gains and dividends extension.

Since the provision was unexpectedly added to the tax bill earlier this week, lobbyists for companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp., BP PLC, Chevron Corp., Royal Dutch Shell PLC and ConocoPhillips mounted a campaign in opposition.

The companies rallied their employees to ask senators to oppose the taxes, and instructed lobbyists to generate support for an amendment that will be offered today to water it down. They hoped to prevail using "good old-fashioned lobbying and grass-roots education," said Don Duncan, ConocoPhillips's top Washington lobbyist.

Industry lobbyists told senators that new taxes will discourage companies from drilling for more oil and gas on U.S. land, increasing the country's dependence on foreign oil. During Senate debate, the oil companies were able to trim their new taxes by $700 million to $4.3 billion. They hope to scrap the new taxes entirely in the House, where Republican leaders have vowed to block it.

The oil industry got encouraging news yesterday when senators defeated a string of amendments that would have raised other taxes or gutted existing tax breaks. The Senate defeated, 64-35, legislation offered by Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan of North Dakota that would have imposed a windfall-profit tax on recent oil-company revenue, which has surged to highs.

"If you start having an excessive profits tax on Big Oil, do you have one on Big Microsoft?" asked Sen. Charles Grassley (R., Iowa), the author of the tax bill, before the Senate vote.

Write to Brody Mullins at brody.mullins@wsj.com

Click to format this article for printing Click to format this article for printing  View a list of most popular articles on our site Find out about distributing multiple copies of this article Find out about distributing multiple copies of this article 
 

Click here to return to ShellNews.net HOME PAGE


Click here to return to Royal Dutch Shell Group .com