By Alfred Donovan (All of the underlining below is
mine…)
THE HYPE & SPIN
THE RIGHTS OF NOBEL LAUREATE *KEN SARO-WIWA
TO FREELY HOLD AND AIR HIS VIEWS (ABOUT SHELL):
EXTRACTS FROM Shell.com website:
“We did, however, speak out both publicly and
privately about human rights issues on a number of
occasions. For instance, during the trial of Ken
Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogonis, we publicly stated
that the accused had a right to a fair legal
process. Before the trial, we said Ken Saro-Wiwa
had a right to freely hold and air his views.”
THE RIGHTS OF ALFRED DONOVAN TO EXPRESS HIS
OPINIONS (ABOUT SHELL)
FROM SHELL INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED
LEGAL SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
ORGANISATION REGARDING THE WEBSITE OF ALFRED
DONOVAN: 18 MAY 2005
"The Complainant and the Group it
represents have been aware of the site since the
beginning and whilst they would not endorse or agree
with many of the comments made by the Respondent on
the website, they have taken the view that the
Respondent is entitled to express his opinions and
to use the Internet as a medium for doing so."
SHELL’S SUPPORT FOR THE UN UNIVERSAL
DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FROM THE SHELL DOCUMENT
- BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: A MANAGEMENT PRIMER: ©
Shell International Petroleum Company (SIPC) 1998)
“We have also lent our support to international
declarations and standards that were developed to
foster human rights, including the UN’s Universal
Declaration of Human Rights…”
3.12. So what does all this mean for Shell companies
and the individuals within those companies?
The Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies supports
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other
international human rights standards.
(The document republishes the entire text of The
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights
or UDHR - reproduced in full on pages 27-31)
Article 19
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and
expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through any media
and regardless of
frontiers.”
2.1 What Are Human Rights?
The key document providing an answer to this
question is the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The UDHR
consists of a preamble
and thirty articles, which list both “civil and
political rights” (such as the
right to a fair trial, freedom from torture,
freedom of conscience…
ENTRACTS FROM SHELL DOCUMENTS ENDS
THE REALITY i.e. WHAT SHELL
MANAGEMENT DOES AS OPPOSED TO WHAT IT SAYS
EIGHT Royal Dutch Shell companies collectively
obtained a HIGH COURT INJUNCTION and RESTRAINING
ORDER against a former employee, Dr John Huong, a
Malaysian who, driven by his conscience, blew
the whistle on Shell management misdeeds including
the fabrication of hydrocarbon reserves and health
and safely issues which put Shell employee lives at
risk. The sole purpose of the draconian litigation
against this unemployed Malaysian, who was
sidelined, humiliated and ultimately sacked for
speaking the truth, was to prevent him exercising
HIS RIGHTS to freedom of conscience and freedom
of expression following his wrongful dismissal.
We also have evidence that Shell has succeeded in
using the action against Dr Huong to frighten former
Shell Malaysian employees from speaking out against
the injustices heaped upon them by Shell. Several
hundred of them, many elderly, sick, and dying,
recently won a retirement funds case against Shell
when a Judge ruled that Shell had acted “unlawfully”
in making inappropriate deductions. Shell is however
ruthlessly dragging out the case by appealing the
judgment based on a legal loophole relating to time
limits.
In June 2005 Shell had five Irishman - now known as
the "Rossport Five", jailed for 3 months for
engaging in an entirely peaceful campaign against
the Corrib pipeline project on entirely valid health
and safety grounds. They were released after
thousands of Irish people engaged in street protests
in response to such oppressive behaviour by an
arrogant multinational giant whose actions are
dictated by a bungling management drunk on power and
corrupted by greed.
This scandal ridden company has a reputation for
incompetence, misjudgement and dishonesty (and as
indicated above) blatant ruthlessness towards some
Shell employees. Led by a CEO, Jeroen van der Veer,
himself facing fraud allegations in the US courts,
Shell has recently demonstrated breathtaking
arrogance by indulging itself in a fleet of luxury
jets. This is at a time when according to The Sunday
Times, other multinationals are getting rid of their
executive planes. It seems that the rights of some
Shell employees - its ego driven bosses - are more
important than others.
Thus the reality of Shell management actions
is totally at odds with their Spin & Hype.
* Ken Saro-Wiwa was hanged by the evil Nigerian
military regime which was closely associated with
Shell at that time. Sir Philip Watts is being sued
in connection with allegations that while head of
Shell in Nigeria he personally helped to create and
arm a 1400 strong private spy force. Furthermore,
Shell has admitted that an undercover agent working
for them carried out operations in Nigeria. His
cover story involved making a film in Nigeria called
“Business as Usual: the Arrogance of Power”, during
which he interviewed friends of Ken Saro-Wiwa.
Shell’s spy, German-born Manfred Schlickenrieder,
engaged in espionage missions involving deception,
sabotage, betrayal and intelligence gathering.
Schlickenrieder was known by the code name Camus and
had worked for the German foreign intelligence
service gathering information about terrorist
groups, including the Red Army Faction.
How such activities are compatible with Shell’s
supposed commitment to ethical trading, human rights
and its STATEMENT OF GENERAL BUSINESS PRINCIPLES is
beyond my comprehension. The right of Ken Saro-Wiwa
to the most basic human right of all - the right to
live - was taken away from him in the most terrible
circumstances. We wonder if anyone at Shell
management has a conscience about what happened to
this courageous Nigerian who always insisted on
peaceful campaigning against Shell's activities? His
voice might have been useful in the Nigerian Delta
these days.
Royal Dutch Shell Group ShellNews.net: ROYAL DUTCH SHELL SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & FREEDOM OF SPEECH: PR HYPE & SPIN VS. REALITY: Mon 06 Feb 2006 |
|