By Tom Shiel 
	Jan 26, 2006 
	
	LANDOWNERS opposed to the onshore Corrib gas pipeline in Co Mayo yesterday 
	snubbed a top-level delegation from energy giant Shell who travelled to the 
	area on a fact-finding mission. 
	
	Three non-executive directors of Royal Dutch Shell plc, including Wim Kok, a 
	former prime minister of the Netherlands, went to the Rossport and 
	Bellanaboy area where it is proposed that gas from the Corrib Field will be 
	brought ashore and processed. 
	
	Accompanying Mr Kok were Nina Henderson and Maarten van den Bergh. They were 
	joined on the trip by Tom Botts, executive vice-president for Shell's 
	European Exploration & Production business. 
	
	The three are members of Shell's Social Responsibility Committee (SRC), a 
	committee established in 1997 to review the policies and conduct of the 
	company in relation to its commitment around Business Principles and Health, 
	Safety and Environment. 
	
	In this capacity they frequently visit Shell projects around the world to 
	listen to local communities and to try to understand the impact that such 
	projects have on the communities, customers, employees and the shareholders.
	
	
	During their Mayo visit the directors met with local political 
	representatives, resident groups, consenting landowners and other interested 
	parties to listen to their views on and concerns about the Corrib pipeline 
	project. 
	
	In a statement yesterday, Shell expressed disappointment that an invitation 
	to the non-consenting landowners to meet with the board members was declined 
	and hopes that a dialogue at a later date will be possible. 
	
	"Together with my colleagues on the board of Royal Dutch I frequently visit 
	Shell projects around the world, as an independent observer," 
	
	"We, the board members, are independent and are interested in how the 
	project touches communities, employees and shareholders and in understanding 
	the difficulties and challenges around the Corrib project from a local 
	perspective," said Mr Kok. 
	
	Shell said the meeting was completely independent from the ongoing mediation 
	process that the company is continuing to participate in.